2020 / Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Improvement and satisfaction follow different curves.

Is a five-month line response the same as five-month satisfaction?

Source access: publication abstract

The study#

Design
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Population
300 participants with glabellar lines
Follow-up / endpoint
150 days
Source
Dermatologic Surgery, 2020 Β· PMID 31356432

What the authors found#

At day 150, 45% showed at least one-grade improvement, while 35% remained satisfied with their glabellar appearance.[1]

days of follow-up
β‰₯1-grade improvement45%
Satisfied35%
Each bar uses the same 0–100% scale. Values are study-specific; confidence intervals are not supplied here.

Editorial interpretation

Why it is interesting#

A clinical severity score and a patient's satisfaction capture different aspects of benefit.

Always state which outcome remains improved at the quoted timepoint.

What it cannot tell us#

  • A single treatment and indication; the findings are not a brand-wide duration claim.
  • These are different endpoints in the active group, not two competing products.

Selection for this library reflects educational interest. It is not a systematic search, formal certainty grade, or complete account of the literature.

Funding & commercial context#

Consult the publication's full text for funding and conflict-of-interest statements; the abstract does not provide a complete disclosure.

Continue with the product

Source & citation#

Monheit et al. β€” abobotulinumtoxinA response and satisfaction β†—

Checked 2026-09-06 Β· Dermatologic Surgery, 2020 Β· PMID 31356432. Cite the original publication when discussing its results; this page is an interpretation.

Aesthetic Pass. Improvement and satisfaction follow different curves. Product Atlas research interpretation 2026.09.06.1. https://aestheticpass.com/products/studies/abobotulinumtoxin-response-vs-satisfaction/